Published
3 years agoon
By
Ron RichterAn ordinance that would stiffen the penalty for possessing or using tobacco products on school grounds in Sheridan was an item of discussion Monday night at a Sheridan City Council study session. Sheridan Media’s Ron Richter has the details.
In response to an extreme increase in the use of electronic cigarettes, or vape pens on school grounds, officials with Sheridan County School District Two have requested the City adopt an ordinance that can be used by the school district to discourage vaping among students. Currently under state statute, anyone under the age of 21 who possesses tobacco products on school grounds is subject to a fine of no more than $25. The ordinance that is being proposed would allow for a fine of up to $750, which is the standard misdemeanor maximum. Under the proposed ordinance, the Court may also order the minor to attend a tobacco education class and if the minor is convicted three times, he or she would then be eligible for probation.
Sheridan Junior High Discipline Assistant Dan White addressed the Council on the issue of vaping at the junior high.
District Two Superintendent Scott Stults also addressed the Council on the vaping problem within the schools.
Several councilors expressed interest in having more information on the state statute that the Legislature approved last year that sets the maximum fine at $25 and whether the proposed ordinance should be for the entire City, not just within the school district. The Council agreed to move forward with the proposed ordinance with the likelihood of amending the ordinance as it moves its way through the process of three readings before it can take effect.
Ezra Petersen
July 26, 2021 at 10:38 pm
Then the leaders of SCSD #2 should talk to the state legislature. These kind of issues are what we elected the state reps for. We don’t need a patchwork of laws of varying consequence throughout the state. If someone came to the city council about something with guns they wouldn’t touch it with a ten foot pole, and that is because we elect our state legislators for such matters.
Steve Lowman
July 27, 2021 at 12:25 pm
Ezra, well said
Sam Grover
July 28, 2021 at 5:45 am
Money grab. Plain and simple. We should be discussing real solutions for this problem. Everyone involved knows full well that these kids aren’t paying the fines they are proposing, the parents are. And in many of these cases the kids may not be in the best of family situations to begin with, so what are they really doing other than straining a family already in a bad situation.